The Millenium Project 

Home >The GAL Chronicles > Chapter 2
Bookmark and Share

Alphabetical ListCategoriesCommentariesArchiveAbout the SiteHate MailBook ShopSite Map/Search

The GAL Chronicles
Chapter 2
December 10, 2000 to March 31, 2001
A story of a gutless anonymous liar

See the rest of The GAL Chronicles
Chapter 1| Chapter 2 | Chapter 3 | Chapter 4 | Chapter 5 | Chapter 6 | Chapter 7
(Chapter 7 is the current page)

The Gutless Anonymous Liar returned after a long hiatus. It must have taken that long to figure out how to use another anonymous mailing service. Far less time was required at this end to realise that the messages are still lies and still worthless.

Date sent: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 14:48:19 +0100
Subject: Oxygen Starved at Birth
From: "" <>

Please forgive me for sending anonymous email. I just don\\\'t want to become one of your victims.

Your site is absolute garbage.

Now that really put me in my place. Criticism from an anonymous person, with a really meaningful subject line and a comprehensive deconstruction of everything here. Of course I\\\'ll forgive you.

Date sent: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 02:11:07 +0100
Subject: Time to review your code!
From: "" <>

You are a complete sphincter! Once it was the eyes are a relection of the soul. And, now it\\\'s your web site is a reflection of your soul! You are so fucked up!

Here\\\'s the litmus test: Show your site to your kids and your wife.

By the way, your site has been broken…check the code. (how we\\\'re able to use your email address!)

GAL should tell Guillaume at to fix his software. The \\\ is annoying. And "" is not a working email address and typing it in is not breaking my site.

Date sent: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 22:23:41 +0100
Subject: Here\\\'s an Idea!
From: "" <>

Why don\\\'t your post a fact on your site? A fact that supports one of your claims? Opinion is always intriguing, but without fact it\\\'s an obsession, not an opinion. Are you obsessed? Do you have too much time on your hands?

Isn't it funny how people keep asking me to support my claims. I don't make any claims. I leave that up to the liars and quacks who claim to be able to cure cancer and AIDS. They've got the claims. They just don't have the evidence. Never have. Never will. They have the money, though. They get it from the desperate patients and their families.

Date sent: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:44:36 +0100
Subject: You make no claims?
From: "" <>

Liars? Quacks? You have no facts concerning anything or anyone you critisize, or who you judge a liar or a quack. That\\\'s not opinion.

Amuse us. Provide a fact.

I have continually asked people who claim to have cured cancer in sometimes thousands of patients to let me help them get a Nobel Prize. None of them have come forward. That's a fact. They don't come forward because they can't cure cancer. That's another fact. People who claim to be able to cure cancer and can not do it are liars and quacks. That's another fact. Prove me wrong. It should be real easy for anyone with a list of cured patients.

And was it GAL who mentioned me and rat fucking once before? No, that was someone else. Ain't that a fact!

I don't know if this is the same GAL, although it could be another case of Multiple Disordered Personalities. The writing style has changed before, but it eventually reverts to demented.

Date sent: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:25:09 +0100
Subject: Perhaps you might set up a webcam so the world can watch you masturbate!
From: "" <>

Thought I\\\'d join in the fun!(Thanks for e-mail tip!)

Your site is disgusting. Do really think anyone is interested in what you think?..and how fucked up you are? On the other hand I suppose this rancid past time of yours keeps you away from children.

You are in Australia, I think. That explains alot, doesn\\\'t it?

Date sent: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 23:30:09 +0100
Subject: Perhaps you might set up a webcam so the world can watch you masturbate!
From: "" <>

I forgot. Here\\\'s a question for you. Other than having an opinion, do you have any information that might support any the positions you take? Let\\\'s begin with vaccinations. Provide evidence that vaccination does not cause injury.

I\\\'m sorry, what was that?

Five minutes later, and he's asking the same old questions again. I'm sorry, but I don't have to prove a thing. I have never claimed that vaccinations don't cause injury. I have just said that it is very unlikely. It is the anti-vaccination liars who say different, so they are the ones who have to prove their claim. And when are you going to get Guillaume at to fix that "\\\" thing in the software? Hmmm! "Guillaume"? Isn't that the French version of "William"? What a coincidence. There is someone called William who writes to me quite often.

Date sent: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 02:16:50 +0100
Subject: If we could only stop the world and let you off
From: "" <>

Vaccines safe? You are truly misinformed or remarkably dumb, or perhaps both.

Your site, your uninformed opinions are an an insult to those of us whose children have been injured by vaccination.

Why don\\\'t you provide us with evidence that demonstraqte vaccines are safe and effective?

Didn\\\'t think you could. windbag

I don't know what this lying cretin thinks it is going to achieve by sending me messages like this. Debate is futile with anyone who refuses to recognise the value of vaccination, as they are either deceived because someone has lied to them, brain-dead, or prepared to lie in the face of overwhelming evidence. In any case, I don't debate anonymous liars. And how do I know they are liars? Well, nobody concerned with the truth would hide behind an anonymiser service. This message was sent to me twice. It made no more sense the second time.

Date sent: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 21:21:18 +0100
Subject: Vaccine Injury
From: "" <>

\\\"I have never claimed....just said its very unlikely\\\" This is what is called a \\\"claim\\\".

How unlikely? You haven\\\'t a clue do you.

Tell you what you remarkable uninformed man, get the facts and we\\\'ll chat. Can you?

Didn\\\'t think you could.

Fucking wind bag!

By the way, I see from perusing your \\\"organ\\\" and the web that you have alot of detractors. Can you figure it out yet? Didn\\\'t think you could.

Hmmmm. The style is evolving into something familiar.

Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 00:10:46 +0100
Subject: Buggeries of Bowditch
From: "" <>

Upon reviewing your site, it becomes increasingly more apparent there is some pathology involved. Despite the good medicine you so blindly \\\"subscribe\\\" to, there is no hope for you unless one discovers the cure for \\\"malignant personality\\\". Although, you might consider some good alternative medicine, perhaps even a colon cleanse with sulphuric acid.

You are eveything that is wrong with the internet. Your site is utter filth and your opinions have no basis in fact. Having only opinion and no facts reduces you to the likes of hate and kiddie porn propagators, as so many of your detractors have suggested.

Here\\\'s the challenge: Produce a fact!? Or kill yourself!

We\\\'ve noticed your reference to ficticious tribute web sites. Be patient we\\\'ll do the job justice. (We particularly enjoy all the references to your sexual proclivaties and fictional financial empire...time to probe).

And, remember one fact..

Aahh! That's better. The old spelling style is back, and what's this about "hate and kiddie porn"? I seem to remember Mr William O'Neill talking about that too. Have you been talking about me behind my back, or is it just another coincidence (like the zoobidou site being run by someone called "Guillaume")? And more tribute sites are coming? I hope they are better and more original than the last lot.

Date sent: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 21:49:52 +0100
Subject: The viagra is not working?
From: "" <>

The only possible reason for your \\\"great\\\" effort in your organ can be that the Viagra is not working. Otherwise you\\\'d likely be fucking your Bichon Frise instead of all these poor innocent victims.

It is quite sad that this is the best that GAL could come up with on a full moon, and it even had a new packet of coloured chalk too. And why does it keep talking about my organ? What has it got against musicians? The only time I have ever come across the term "Bichon Frise" was on the menu at the local Vietnamese restaurant, but why would I want to do that to lamb cutlets?

Date sent: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 01:24:04 +0100
Subject: Think Again!
From: "" <>

Being a fellow Austalian and essentially a neighbour of yours, and having a child who has been diabled by vaccination, I feel compelled to write to you about this senseless exercise you call the Millenium Project.

You claim that vaccines are \\\"good\\\" and the right thing to do. Let me tell you that my child experienced anafalaxsis within 20 minutes of being vaccinated for DPT and has been profoundly developmentally handicapped since that time. There is no rationale for vaccinating in this manner when injury is obviously inevitable. In fact the America\\\'s CDC reports vaccine injury that is in the thousands each and every year.

I will be writing and petitioning any and everyone that can force or influence you to stop propagating such obvious lies. I am also a member of the Australian Computer Society and I will be making representation to them concerning your membership.

Your site is an abomination.

Could this be the Gutless Anonymous Liar, writing almost literately? This person must have done a lot (or should that be "alot"?) of research about me to know that I am a member of the ACS, unless it already knew it because it had complained in vain to them before. I am also a member of Parramatta Leagues Club, so it should write to them about my membership as well, and I think I am still a confirmed (although non-practising) member of the Anglican Communion in NSW, so perhaps it should complain to the Archbishop of Sydney. Of course, nobody will take any notice unless it says who it is, and it won't do that because then it would be revealed as a liar.

Date sent: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 18:14:29 +0100
Subject: We will see who the liar is.
From: "" <>

I note your quaint, infantile and indignent response to my e-mail.My anonymity is only with you. I\\\'ve seen what you have done to others who reveal their identity to you.

I intend on introducing your lies and intentions to mislead and misinform to those who can sanction you. I will persue some form of closure that insures the type of lunacy you peddle is stopped. Perhaps you\\\'d like to address my daughter in the press and tell her of all the good vaccination can be.

You are foul man with distorted ideas and clearly devoted misinforming the public.

Perhaps this person might like to think about the logical absurdity of saying "My anonymity is only with you". The only way it (I have to say "it" because it has hidden its identity) can expect anyone to take it seriously is for it to use a name and once this happens I will know what that name is. Of course, it could continue lying by using a false name. I say "continue" because using an anonymising service is just a special case of lying about your name. Can you imagine being so unsure of your beliefs and convictions that you would not be prepared to put your name to them? And what have I done to people who have revealed their identities to me? I have always been polite to these people and have never threatened, for example, to complain to professional bodies about them. Anonymous liars (a tautology, I know) deserve only contempt.

I had a moratorium for some time on mail from anonymous remailers. The following two messages sneaked through before I turned the filter on.

Date sent: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:40:46 +0100
Subject: Anonymity is not lying...
From: "" <>

Anonymity is not lying and therein lies the problem: you don\\\'t know the difference. You\\\'re right, however, let\\\'s stop pretending. I intend on phoning the local press, tell them about you, and how my daughter\\\'s disability is a figment of the \\\"anti-vaccinationist liars\\\" imaginings. And with this the anonymity will cease.

You are a demented little cretin and I resent the fact that I share the same neighbourhood with you. But I\\\'m sure that will all change in due course. See you in the papers and hopefully on the the television as well!

Five minutes later, proving that the statement "And with this the anonymity will cease" was a lie:

Date sent: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 04:45:22 +0100
Subject: Anonymity is not lying...
From: "" <>

One matter did escpae me. Anonymity, before the internet, implied some form of cowardice. The internet, on the other hand, morphed anonymity into a pre-emptive defence mechanism, simply because of the apparent distances in geography and jurisdiction. In this instance, rest assured that this is not the case. We have met and I am ashamed to admit it.

I'm sorry. Anonymity still implies some form of cowardice if you are using it to call people names and threaten them.

Date sent: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 22:20:23 +0100
Subject: The Sydney Morning Herald
From: "" <>

We\\\'ll see who the coward is, won\\\'t we. Spent 4 hours being interviewed today. They know you and agree your site is obscene. They have contacted the ACS which is claiming they were not aware of your activites. (Correspondence suggests otherwise.)They also plan on contacting your ISP.

Looking forward to introducing myself to you in the press!

More anonymous nonsense coming in after the lie "And with this the anonymity will cease" was written. It can't seem to help itself, can it? And how about the hypocrisy of something too scared to say its own name calling me a coward? And a four-hour press interview!! There are probably a dozen people in Australia who would rate an interview this long, and none of those people will be the sort to sit there with a bag over their head saying "I'm not going to tell you who I am".

Date sent: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 20:41:31 +0100
Subject: See you in the Herald Harrold!
From: "" <>

Thought I\\\'d drop by and see how you\\\'re doing. It seems everyone is using to email with you. It also seems to be really getting under skin. How delightful.

Incidentally, I was so entranced by your latest victim\\\'s effort with the local press that I called the Herald. You and I shall meet under the light of day. By the way who is Dennis is why is he pissed at you? The Herald wants to know.

The old style is back. And more questions about Dennis. At least it's spelling his name correctly now.

Date sent: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:36:57 +0100
Subject: G\\\'day you hamiltonian twerp!
From: "" <>

Love your website. Referred by a mutal aquaintance: Mr. A\\\'nonymous. I love the idea of taunting incredibly pompous assholes like you. The best part is doing so anonymously: oooooo it\\\'s just so cowardly. More importantly though, it appears to really piss you off!

I do hope you give me some recognition. Please get nasty you bad boy!

Referred by a "mutal aquaintance"? You must have met in spelling classes.

Date sent: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:39:28 +0100
Subject: I\\\'m piping up too!
From: "" <>

I\\\'ve telephoned the Herald to join in the chorus. I shared my impressions of your \\\"piece du merde\\\" and my thoughts of who you might be!

Thoughts of who I might be? There is no doubt who I might be. With you there is a very small amount of doubt.

Date sent: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 02:40:23 +0100
Subject: You are such an ASSHOLE!
From: "" <>

Pissed yet?


Date sent: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 03:13:00 +0100
Subject: Since you\\\'re not publishing....but we\\\'re sure that will change..
From: "" <>

You are an absolute \\\"motherfucker!\\\"

This is not opinion it\\\'s fact!

Had a very long chat today with Dennis at the ACS. He tells me your membership has been revoked and the ACS is now convinced that you did fall of the turnip truck.

This is the interesting part: They faxed to me all of the complaints they have received and offered to be of assistance.

The motherfucker part wasn\\\'t mine. It\\\'s a quote! I am filing complaints with the NSW.

A couple of points. Australians never say "motherfucker" except when quoting someone else, so the use of the word suggests that this person is lying both about being an Australian and even being here. That it lies comes as no surprise. I have also spent some time with "Dennis at the ACS" since this email was written and he didn't mention its chat with him. This is probably because it was lying about that too. (Good to see his name being spelled correctly, too, unlike the way it was on some faxes I received from a Canadian.) It was certainly lying about my membership of the ACS being revoked, because I am on one of the committees that would have to discuss this so I would probably have heard about it by now. And good luck with complaining to the NSW.

Date sent: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:42:09 +0100
Subject: Simon says
From: "" <>

Simon says \\\"post this\\\"
Simon says \\\"post that\\\"

You take dictation well....moron!

Date sent: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 22:19:26 +0100
Subject: here\\\'s something really really exciting
From: "" <>

it\\\'s not as though we\\\'ve been sitting here twittlin\\\' our thumbs, old man!! dog fucking asshole! we\\\'ve been researching you!

here\\\'s the poop:

1. you have had no less than 8 isp\\\'s refuse or cancel service to you and you organ based on complaints from users.

2. you have had no less than 22 email acounts closed.

3. you are known to the nsw police service and australian federal police.

4. your site is considered by both as propaganda and hate.

5. you are unemployed.

6. you report an income slighly below australia\\\'s poverty level.

7. you do not own property.

8. you have a chronically poor credit rating.

9. you have remarried.

10. you have spawn an inter-generational family that has a very \\\"unique\\\" yet disturbing history.

11. our \\\"source\\\" tells us that you are \\\"under investigation\\\" because of your internet activites and you have been approached by and are currently defending your actions to a number of governmental agencies and authorities.


And? for your next act?

If you have 11 questions with True/False answers, there are 2048 possible combinations of answers. Only one out of that 2048 has no correct answers. GAL has managed to do this, and should be congratulated. Bravo!!!! I must admit, however, that I am unsure what Number 10 means. I see that GAL is alluding to rat fucking again. I wonder if it knows Mr O'Neill, because he talked about that once.

Date sent: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:46:58 +0100
Subject: Bravo!
From: "" <>

Been watching from the sidelines for quite awhile and thought there\\\'s no time like the present to join in the fray. Whoever it may be that is sending you anonymous communications is unknown to you. However, you seem certain of the authour\\\'s identity. I have taken the liberty of emailing the gentleman in question and received correspondence from his counsel and copies of correspondence sent to his counsel from a variety of sources in his juridiction and yours.

So the question that begs to be asked is this: Why are you doing this?, and; How much further will you dig your grave before you realize it has become inescapable?

There is more.

According to this gentleman\\\'s counsel, the more the merrier, so to speak. That is, I have been solicited to provide witness to your libel and defamation of the gentleman in question, and I have agreed. You see, being an Australian and having practiced and taught medicine and ethics in medicine, I find individuals and groups who act as you have, likely the most unscrupulous source of information and advice. In fact, although you feel you operate within the bounds of Australian regulation and legislation, you are operating very much outside the law.

Thus I will persuing any number of options and avenues of complaint and action, while joining any other proponents who may suffered as a direct or indirect result of your actions. Sadly, new legislation as it concerns the internet is presently in front of parliament. It seems that although there has been some confusion concerning the \\\"grey area\\\" of the internet in the past, that will quickly change. You can thank yourself, as a member of the Australian Computer Society, and propagators of the same ilk.

If someone is going to pretend that they are an Australian, they had better learn how Australians spell words. I am not referring here to the normal illiteracy and carelessness I have come to expect from GAL and that "same ilk", but instead I mean words which are actually spelled differently here than in North America. Put another way, there is at least one word in there which is spelled correctly if you are, say, a Canadian but incorrectly if you are an Australian. Speaking of poor spelling, I have suggested elsewhere that maybe the apparent errors in GAL's effluences aren't spelling mistakes at all, maybe they're lies about how words are spelled. It's consistent with compulsive lying and helps to keep the lie count up.

Date sent: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:22:50 +0100
Subject: your wife is a butt ugly cunt!
From: "" <>

That's all there is, folks. No message, just a subject line. And as for the language, I can only quote what Mr O'Neill said once: "he simply can't help himself, and so it come to this".

Date sent: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:57:38 +0100
Subject: Here\\\' a question?
From: "" <>

(Not that we would expect an answer)

What is your liability for posting/publishing information on your site that you know is false or that you have inappropriately attributed authorship?

(You\\\'re just about to find out)!!!!!

I have lost count of how many times I have been about to find out about legal or official action against this site. And how would I answer when the correspondent uses the coward's refuge of an anonymous remailer? The person who wrote that must be stupid as well as gutless.

Date sent: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:51:19 +0100
From: "" <>


Look! It's got its elbow stuck on the shift key. There are no pictures of my family on this site. Why ask, GAL? Are you planning to do something with pictures of my family? That would be brave, wouldn't it? Oh, I'm sorry. I forgot that you don't understand the concept of "brave" so you won't understand the irony either.

Date sent: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:28:54 +0100
Subject: Was it really a moratorium or were you just in a \\\"snit\\\"?
From: "" <>

It\\\'s really entertaining to sit and watch your apoplexia! Given that bewteen beating your wife and abusing your dog, you have quite a bit of time on your hands, we knew you couldn\\\'t resist for long. The fact of the matter is, you really haven\\\'t much else to do. Combined with the fact that your rancid and foul personality can feed only off the rot that comes your way, we knew you\\\'d have to come back to the table. Dig in deep you puppet!

It doesn't seem to understand that I make the rules around here. I ditched some messages but then I reconsidered because this stuff is so funny that it is not fair not to share it around. It's like watching reruns of the Three Stooges, except this clown pokes himself in the eye.

Date sent: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:28:33 +0100
Subject: share
From: "" <>

Seems you have had some rather disturbing visitors to your site over the past little bit of time...haven\\\'t you?

Please share :)

(There\\\'s really no need to...we\\\'ve logged everyone for you....seems the AFP have joined mindit and are in and out of your site almost as much as you are...paranoid yet...\\\"no of course i\\\'m not...i\\\'ve nothing to hide or defend...these are just my opinions...\\\"...not anymore.....) It\\\'s just beginning to get fun!

In the words of ricky ricardo:

\\\"lucy you hav sum sesplaining to do\\\"

I don't know about "disturbing visitors", but GAL's been here so I must have had at least one seriously disturbed visitor. And it's logged visitors to this site? That would be clever, but of course it is lying. I have visions of Australian Federal Police officers putting notes in their Palm Pilots to remind them to tell gutless anonymous liars what the AFP is up to. And GAL is funnier than I Love Lucy – Ricky was just pretending to be an idiot.

Date sent: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 21:33:34 +0100
Subject: I followed the link...but I don\\\'t understand?
From: "" <>

And?...Surely you must be Joking? Inventing? Lying? Misleading? Defrauding? Is there a pathology you\\\'d like to share? It can be used as a defence? excuse? And who did you say killed whom? Go ahead say it again. We\\\'re listening. We dare you......

I think the link it is talking about is one to a site where a couple of liars were trying to justify the actions of a murderer who held a ten-week-old baby by his feet and bashed him to death. I'm not surprised that GAL didn't understand, because there were a lot of big words there. I'm assuming the dare is for me to say that Alan Yurko killed his son. A jury thought so. That's why Yurko is in prison.

Date sent: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 17:55:19 +0100
Subject: Are you a Gutless Fucking Asshole?
From: "" <>

Go ahead...gutless fucking asshole...say it...who killed whom?...go ahead publish it... remember, it\\\'s just opinion...we\\\'ll see where your fucking opinion gets you this time....

gutless coward....

It seems incapable of rational thought. I have already answered this question but it asks it again.

Date sent: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 00:54:30 +0100
Subject: Your usenet postings are hilarious!
From: "" <>

You self-appointed vigilante right wing fuck! Your \\\"opinions\\\" are so remarkably obvious of one who is uninformed, ignorant, and indelibly stupid. Do you think anyone takes you seriously?

GAL must take me seriously, because it keeps picking up its crayon and scribbling notes to me.

Date sent: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 01:24:44 +0100
Subject: Go ahead.....say incredible fucking coward....
From: "" <>

Go ahead you self-righteous coward... Publish on your \\\"website\\\".....the murderer of baby allan...

Didn\\\'t think you could/would...better yet...let\\\'s sit down and talk about name the time and the place....

Don\\\'t think you can get of this one.....

What is the matter with this thing? Why can't it read? I have answered this question before. If it chooses to look at the editorial about baby "allan" it will see that I say who killed him. (Actually, the baby I was talking about was called "Alan" before his father murdered him. I assume we are talking about the same murdered child here.) A jury also said who killed him. Alan Yurko murdered his child. That is why Alan Yurko is in prison. Don't think he can get out of this one.

Date sent: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 01:29:27 +0100
Subject: Get a scanner!!
From: "" <>

Hey Mr. \\\"Bowditch\\\". Why don\\\'t you scan those lovely letters you recently received from the ACS and Australian Federal Poice Service onto your web site. You certainly have been told haven\\\'t you.

By the way check AsiaBiz.....\\\"gebesse computer consultants and dildo emporium\\\" been a little dry lately...hasn\\\'t it?

I have a scanner, thank you. As I haven't yet received these letters from the ACS and the Australian Federal "Poice" (there is no "Service" after the name), perhaps GAL would like to fax me its copies. It must have copies, otherwise it would have no way of knowing that the letters had been sent to me. Unless it's lying of course. Silly me, of course it's lying. That is what it does. And why is my name in quotes? I make no secret of my name, unlike gutless anonymous liars who are so ashamed of their lies that they hide like roaches under the refrigerator. I apologise to any roaches who are offended by being compared to GAL – I am only commenting on the scuttling behaviour and I am aware that roaches are generally honest and do not try to hide who they are.

Date sent: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 17:47:09 +0100
Subject: wakey wakey....
From: "" <>

time to wake up mr. less-than-zero-ditch... time to post! simon says......?

c\\\'mon, you worthless pederast....scan and post all those lovely letters of the letters from the afp, acs, and various lawyers.... oh, we don\\\'t receive letters of complaints \\\'cause your site is just \\\"opinion\\\"....

by the way, check out and your site are mentioned..l......\\\"....right-wing fringe groups and individuals who have an axe to grind.......The Millenium Project, operated out of Australia, by a reclusive retired computer consultant, is a prime example of the opportunity the web presents in propagating hate, intolerance, misinformation, and outright lies and deception cloaked as opinion protected by freedom of speech....Australian authorities advise, sites like the Millenium Project are subject to regulation under Australia\\\'s new broadcast laws as it concerns the internet......complaints have been received and action has been taken....\\\"

mmmm.....what could this mean...

p.s. post and post now

I'm mentioned in Science – the journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science? One of the most prestigious scientific publications in the world? Why do I not believe this? Oh, of course! I don't believe it because the Gutless Anonymous Liar said it and that is a sure sign that something is not true. And what's this "less-than-zero-ditch", "worthless pederast", "as it concerns" and "what could this mean" stuff? Does Mr O'Neill know that GAL is copying his writing style?

Date sent: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 18:07:02 +0100
Subject: Peter Bowditch takes it in the arse and he likes it!
From: "" <>

Just perused the newsgroups and delighted to see at best you are reviled by your \\\"colleagues\\\", but you keep coming back for more. The only possible reason is that you were (are) abused. Please share with us...tell us of your can help...

By the way, of 274 posts authored by you in the last six months, 246 have elicited negative and derogatory responses directed at you and your site...that\\\'s almost you get it yet?...didn\\\'t think so....

Wow! There's some research for you. Just imagine – I write things in discussion forums and people write back to discuss things. Who would ever have thought that conversation worked like that?

Date sent: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 01:20:26 +0100
Subject: \\\"make me want to vomit\\\"
From: "" <>

go ahead and do choke on it.....

wouldn\\\'t it be a great world if your epitaph read.....\\\"......and he choked on his own vomit....\\\"

but, alas, it will likely read.....\\\"......and he died a painful and slow death in his own feces....\\\"

may god help your offspring!

Date sent: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:08:01 +0100
Subject: \\\", there\\\'s some research....\\\"
From: "" <>

how do you explain that greater that 90% of those you \\\"cummunicate\\\" or have \\\"discussions\\\" with in usenet groups revile you?...have derogatory comments about you?...and/or basically tell you to fuck off?

\\\"....people write back....\\\" don\\\'t think so... read the reponses or have your occupational therapist read them to you....and remind her to read slowly \\\'cause you can\\\'t listen quickly...

by the way, business still as \\\"brisk\\\" as it used to be?....didn\\\'t think so...funny how good news travels fast! the way visit \\\"asiabiz\\\"....your new mongraph is delightful!

tah tah....

It keeps mentioning "asiabiz". If it means the site at, my company is mentioned there but I see nothing to complain about, although I must get them to fix the spelling error. If it means then it doesn't know what it is talking about. Of course, it is almost inevitably lying, so it probably doesn't mean anything at all.

Date sent: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 16:13:27 +0100
Subject: Just Imagine!
From: "" <>

Melbourne court to decide on criminal harassment charge of Australian harassing a Canadian on the internet! Stay tuned!

Aside from the fact that the correct wording would be "Victorian court", I don't see what this has to do with me. Is GAL a Canadian? A correct reference to the court and case would be useful, but will not be forthcoming because to do that could be telling the truth, something of which GAL is incapable.

Date sent: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 19:43:48 +0100
Subject: and what hell has thou brought!
From: "" <>

funny how it all comes out even in the end, ain\\\'t it!

recent correspondence offers assistance and condolences from both the Australian Computer Society and the Australian Federal Police...

seems you\\\'re \\\"known\\\" as \\\"an unhinged stalker who preys on those who might test his intolerance and intelligence\\\"

gee....that seems to really sum it up!

by the way, you have also been cited in a recent New Zealand journal article with Stephen \\\"shut-the-fuck-up-or-i\\\'ll-sue-you\\\" Barrett...first, Barrett was described as a propagandist....with the addition of you, the total sum of your aggregate attemtps to rid the world of everything you\\\'re incapable of grasping, you and the barr-attolah are described as \\\"a right wing presence that thrives on propagating lies, invention, and fraud\\\"...

wow..wee....\\\"yummy yummy yummy i got luv in my tummy.......\\\"

This is the best it could do on a full moon? Isn't it sad how this thing keeps writing to just me telling me things that I know are not true. If it wanted to embarrass me, it should tell someone else. I know it hasn't received any "condolences" from the Australian Computer Society, and I would be fascinated to see what the Australian Federal Police had to say. Fax it to me GAL. You know the number. And they're writing about me in New Zealand, too? I'd like to see that!

Date sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:07:32 +0100
Subject: You are such an incredible fucking lunatic!
From: "" <>

so now you\\\'re picking on poor young women who offer aromatherapy for puppies?....let\\\'s get this straight...all who know and \\\"love\\\" you must be thoroughly disgusted and at the same time very very very proud of you and relieved that you can vent on the internet instead of beating the crap out of your chattels...perhaps you can target the boy scouts of america, or the catholic church, or perhaps even find some software where you can virtually pull the wings off of flies..or fingenails off of children.....

by the to the acs....they are pissed!!!....and who wouldn\\\'t be.....a memebers site that reads like the rantings of a sociopath\\\'s journal?.... being a \\\"member\\\" of an organization that sets such \\\"high\\\" professional standards, the acs has come to the conclusion that you have single-handedly flushed their reputation and good standing down the crapper!.....

.....oh and by the way.....the afp considers your actions as \\\"stalking\\\"....get it yet?!....didn\\\'t think so......

I was in the ACS office last Thursday. It was someone's birthday and I was offered a piece of cake to have with my coffee. And who am I stalking? I'm not the one running around in the shadows, too frightened to say who I am and lying about things that I couldn't possibly know. Fax me whatever you have received from the ACS and AFP. Can't do it? I didn't think so.

Date sent: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:35:34 +0100
Subject: advice to poke-a-boy?
From: "" <>

what great fun reading your posts in are such an pompous asshole whose only contribution is the contrast of black to see the white...

It would be much more fun if GAL stopped lurking in the newsgroups and joined in. Of course, then its IP address would be revealed and we would know who it is. Then again, it probably doesn't know how to post to Usenet now that Deja has been taken over by Google. Still, we all look forward to hearing from it over there, and it will save me from posting its rantings there for all to see. I will, of course, continue to publish its drivel here.

Date sent: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:03:30 +0100
From: "" <>
Subject: [healthfraud] Stan Polanski suck cocks and throws rocks at the moon.

hey stan.....why don\\\'t you go fuck yourself!

This was posted to the Healthfraud discussion list. Nobody knows why GAL doesn't like Stan. The best suggestion that anyone could come up with was that Stan had pointed out to a newspaper that there was a testimonial on the Canadian Cancer Research Group web site dated 4 July 1998 from a person who died in December 1998. Why this should bother GAL is a real mystery.

Date sent: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 23:44:57 +0100
From: "" <>

That's all there was. GAL should be congratulated for writing something without lies in it. It must have been difficult.

Date sent: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:31:13 +0100
Subject: Heard About your troubles!!!!
From: "" <>

Well,Well PETERratBITCH!!!!WhAt is this aBOut you BeInG shut-dOWn..........UNderSTAnd the AUStralIAn Staste hospital is coming too PicK you up and PuT a straiight jackEt on you!!!!Perhaps this is BeCouse of YoUR hate site!!!! Mmmmm.....................

Tragic! And, yes, what is this about me being shut-dOWn? A look around will show that this site is well and truly here, together with the eleven mirror sites. Soon to be twelve, now that talk of shutting down has started again. I don't know where the "AUStralIAn Staste hospital" is, but someone from the Red Cross came around collecting money for their annual appeal. Maybe that's what GAL is gibbering about. It's not really close enough, though, to count as a truth, is it? Need I point out the improbability of any health authority telling some anonymous drooler about its business?

Date sent: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:34:40 +0100
Subject: You are ludicrous
From: "" <>

You really adre ludicrous!!! You must knoww thEs!I MEaN fMy God man,What do yuo hoPe to AccOm;plish with this site.

Three minutes later. Tragicer!

Date sent: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:35:43 +0100
From: "" <>


One minute later. But look! No lies! How does it do it?

Date sent: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:36:58 +0100
Subject: zip the lip
From: "" <>


Another minute. Again, no lies! It's getting better at this all the time.

Date sent: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:57:45 +0100
Subject: Scobey!!!!
From: "" <>

Scobey-doo where are you!!! As You must already know,Dr.Pork-a-boy\\\'s site has been permanetly barred from any isp in Canada! Guess who\\\'s next?

Twenty-one minutes this time, and lying again. It must have needed a rest after all those messages without lies. OK, I know there were only two such messages, but it must have been an awful strain on GAL for it to have done it even once. Am I to assume that I am being banned in Canada? Whoop-de-doo, Scooby-Doo!

Date sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:16:56 +0200
Subject: Just passing by.
From: "" <>

As a fellow Australian,I must commend you on a most horrible one-sided site I have ever seen!!!It reminds me of kiddie porn.I went ahead and did the anonoymous thing cause it really pisses you off!!!Really,this site has been deemed hate by not one but two hate monitoring sites!!!!In fact,you are a fetid dung-heap Mr.Pedo-ditch!!!

The "anonoymous" thing doesn't piss me off. It makes me laugh harder. If it worried me, why would I have bothered to create the Millenium Project Harassment Assistance Tool to make it easier for anonymous (that's how you spell it) fools? I notice that the style and content of Mr O'Neill's posts is being used again. Has he given permission? By the way, Australians spell it "foetid", but I guess spelling mistakes are just a kind of subconscious lying.

Date sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 03:17:57 +0200
Subject: Bowditch takes the nixon
From: "" <>

Had enough!!!!!Mr.blow-ditch!!!!

One minute later! I never understood the reference to Nixon when Mr O'Neill first posted it to Usenet, back in the days when Deja was working. It makes no more sense now.

Date sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:00:57 +0200
Subject: Mmmm...What a site!
From: "" <>

My dear fellow australiwian,I happen to be a neighbor of yours,and I am Appalled,no,I am ashAmed that a australian what propagate such lies and propaganda!!!I hve of course spoken to the Australian federral policem,and they too agree that this site is indeed hate!I am looking foward to the day they shut this site down.

Wow! It's spoken to the "federral policem"! I am looking "foward" to the day when an anonymous liar writes something literate and meaningful.

Date sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:12:32 +0200
Subject: Having a spot trouble?
From: "" <>

I understand you are haveing a spot of trouble,lately? I can\\\'t imagine why? could it be the propaganda and lies yoou have been spreading as of late!!! Mmmmm....inquiring minds want to know!!!As you must know,I have had certain correspondence with a group known as ACS,and they too are tired of the lies and lunatic antics.You may believe you have your isp in your backpocket,but I have spoken to Mr.Kyle and he has assured me that the millenium project is coming down......

As I really know, this lying colony of slime mould has had no correspondence with anyone who could care about what I do. It could prove me wrong, of course, by faxing the correspondence to me, but it can't send what it doesn't have. And who is "Mr Kyle"?

From: somewhere over the rainbow <>
Date sent: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:42:46 (GMT)
Subject: Whenever.........

Whenever you want this to end,just delete the GAL files.

Look, it's found another anonymous remailer. Maybe it will try the Millenium Project Harassment Assistance Tool one day. I like the "somewhere over the rainbow" bit, because it reminds me that GAL was late going to see the Wizard and all the brains and courage had already been given out. There's s bit of fantasy, too, in the idea that I might want this to end. Dream on, GAL. Maybe you'll wake up in Kansas.

Date sent: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:21:17 +1000
From: (Nobody)
Subject: Vistor

I read through your excuse for a site and I ralized that there is no time like the present to step into the fray.I mean you have got to expect this sort of thing when one trys to rid the world of everything you dont know or mis/understand!!!! I have been in contact with the gentlemen you happen to call GAl and I assure within a feew days he well be bringing up legal proceedings against your site in the New South Wales Court,and he has asked me to bear witness to your lunacy and madness!!!

My goodness! A witness. But a witness to what, and will it appear in court with a bag over its head to hide its identity and its shame? And why is a witness necessary if the Australian Federal Police have all the evidence they need? I eagerly await the service of the court papers. How long is a "feew" days? Should I keep a toothbrush in my pocket just in case?

Date sent: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 01:58:37 +0200
Subject: Quaks!
From: "" <>

Quacks,You say? What facts do you provide that prove any of the claims you make!!!Big talk from someone who lives on the other side of the planet! I would love for you to show your face to the your multitude of victims one day!!! Then we would see who was gutless.I have spoken to Mr.Blackwell of the Herald about your rancid pastime,and he too is not amused by your lunatic antics!!! So you may expect a full expose any day now.

It keeps talking about the claims I make. It is the quacks who say that they can cure diseases like cancer who are making the claims. They can't show their faces to their victims because their victims are dead. Perhaps they might like to talk to "Mr Blackwell of the Herald". I look forward to my full exposé.

Date sent: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 02:06:47 +0200
Subject: Woo...Wee
From: "" <>

I noticed by a recent vist to your site that many of your fellow autralians are outraged by your criminal actions and deeds. Well,what can we say but{and we\\\'re sure you\\\'ve heard this before}You made your bed.........The masses have been awoken to lies your profferd!!!

All I can say is that "autralians" must be easily outraged, and I certainly have heard "you made your bed" before. Mr William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer Research Group used to say it often.

Date sent: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:32:44 +0200
Subject: It\\\'s going,going.......gone!!!
From: "" <>

Ah,yes,the good \\\"dr\\\" pole-a-boy\\\'s site is coming down for good..... We\\\'re sure this is not news to you!!!! So you GPOS(Gutless Piece of Shit)....your\\\'s will too!! Within the next 48 hrs from what I have been told by the proper authorities.

Going, going ... onwards! Still here now, still here next week. As it has made a statement that this site is closing down, some more mirror sites will soon be loading themselves into the search engines. And Dr Polevoy's site seems to be going, going ... strong at GAL had better find some more proper authorities.

Date sent: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:35:48 +0200
Subject: Oops!!......My mistake!
From: "" <>

Apparently,Your site(s) will not be coming down within the next 48 hrs,but instead within a few days.I blame erroneous reporting.

I didn't believe the 48 hours bit anyway, so this apology was unnecessary. It doesn't really matter, because it won't be happening in a few days either. I blame erroneous thinking.

And one last thing … (4/5/2013)
I hoped it wasn't someone playing a cruel April Fool's joke when I saw this news in the Ottawa Citizen on April 1.

Yes, folks, the beloved William P O'Neill of the Canadian Cancer Research Group and its descendants has gone to the great cesspit in the sky, taking the Gutless Anonymous Liar with him. Sadly, he died quickly and not of cancer. I posted a message to his memorial guest book, but unfortunately some technical glitch prevented it from being published.

I will maintain my own memorial to him here by archiving his correspondence with me and also the wonderful messages he sent wearing his Gutless Anonymous Liar mask. It would be a tragedy for this valuable collection of literature to disappear.

See the rest of The GAL Chronicles
Chapter 1| Chapter 2 | Chapter 3 | Chapter 4 | Chapter 5 | Chapter 6 | Chapter 7
(Chapter 7 is the current page)


Back to The Millenium Project
Email the
Copyright © 1999-
Creative Commons